Home | About | Issues | Donate Now | Take Action | eNews | Interfaith Peace Chapel
TAKE ACTION!

Hope begins with you.  Here are ways to support Hope for Peace & Justice today!

> Visit the H4PJ Action Center
>
Join the Equality Coalition
> Donate to H4PJ Today
> Tell a Friend

> Subscribe to eNews

PLATINUM SPONSOR

WeDesignWebs.com
Providing web hosting services for Hope for Peace & Justice

SILVER SPONSOR

DonorInk.com
20% of your purchase benefits Hope for Peace & Justice

BRONZE SPONSOR


A leader in the pre-owned automobile industry


Delivering natural products to better the lives and health
of all people

 

 

 


 

Hope for Peace & Justice eNews
May 11, 2006


In this Issue:

Commentary: Let’s put more of the Bible on Ballot
H4PJ Equality Coalition: GLBT Measures on Colorado Ballot
Angels in America Tickets on Sale: Tickets expected to sell fast
Investors to attack Shell over environment
Christian-ism: Believer spells out the difference in faith and politics

Commentary: Let's put more of the Bible on ballot
By Ed Quillen
Originally published by the Denver Post

Given our penchant for initiatives, referenda, constitutional amendments and the like, Colorado ballots can be long and confusing. This year's promises to be even more complex than usual, since there could be as many as four marriage-related items.

One is already assured of a spot. It's the Domestic Partnership Benefits and Responsibilities Act, and last week the General Assembly agreed to refer it to voters. Also called "1344" for its legislative bill number, it would give same-sex couples some rights, such as the ability to make medical decisions for each other and to adopt each other's children.

That is much too fair and humane to suit some Coloradans, and so there are petitions circulating for an amendment to the state constitution to supersede 1344 by forbidding any legal recognition of any status "similar to marriage."

To counter that, there's a proposal to protect 1344 by amending the state constitution to declare that the provisions of 1344 are not "similar to marriage." And there's another constitutional amendment proposed for the ballot (this one designed to ensure a heavy right-thinker turnout at the polls) that would duplicate a state law defining marriage as the union between one man and one woman.

So we have 1344, a referred domestic-partnership law. We may see the anti-1344 constitutional amendment, the protect-1344 constitutional amendment, and the one-man one-woman constitutional amendment.

The simplest solution to all this is one I proposed several years ago: Enact a domestic-partnership law that applies to all couples, and remove "marriage" from all state laws.
Why? As the right-thinkers often remind us, "marriage is a sacrament." Consider other sacraments, like baptism, confirmation and penance. Thanks to certain enlightened provisions in the state and federal bills of rights, the government does not tell churches how to perform these sacraments, nor who may receive them. It's entirely up to the church, as it should be.

Click here to continue reading.

H4PJ Equality Coaliton Update
H4PJ plans to champion Equality in Colorado and 5 other states that are considering discriminatory amendments. However, the cost of producing religious based material calling for equality is large. Focus on the Family and other religious extremists will spend millions in Colorado alone on writing discriminatory into the constitution forever! Join the thousands of people that have.

Tickets on sale for Angels in America
Sunday, May 21 | 6:30 pm | Bath House Cultural Center

Hope for Peace & Justice presents a benefit performance of Tony Kushner’s Tony Award and Pulitzer Prize winning epic Angels in America-Part One: Millennium Approaches on Sunday, May 21 at 6:30 p.m.

The performance will be at the Bath House Cultural Center, 521 E. Lawther Drive, Dallas, TX 75218, on White Rock Lake.

The cast features Hope for Peace & Justice staff member David Plunkett as Joseph Porter Pitt. By purchasing your tickets to this performance, you help us raise money for important campaigns, programs and workshops. Your $50 ticket includes an invitation to a post-show dessert reception.

Click here to buy tickets.

In the first Dallas production of this “gay fantasia on national themes” in more than a decade, Risk Theatre Initiative (RTI) offers an intimate, non-traditional presentation. Widely considered to be the most ambitious American play of our time, Angels in America transports it’s audience from earth to heaven, from New York City to Salt Lake City to Antarctica, from the frightening confines of an agoraphobic’s mind to the crushing guilt of leaving a loved one you can no longer love properly, to the bright white light of hope regained in the face of ultimate loss. In what is becoming a tradition for the young company, RTI defies expectation and perceived limitations with Kushner's intensely human, politically charged and theatrically magical exploration of change and loss on personal, national and metaphysical levels.

Click here to buy tickets today!

Hope for Peace & Justice needs your support to continue to provide a progressive, religious response to the Religious Right. Donations, at any amount, are greatly appreciated.

Click here to Donate to H4PJ

Investors to attack Shell over environment
by John Madeley
Originally Published by The Observer (UK)

Royal Dutch Shell will come under pressure from shareholders at its annual meeting in The Hague and London on 16 May to clean up its environmental act.

A strongly worded shareholder resolution calls for 'a major improvement in Shell's performance in terms of community and stakeholder consultation, risk analysis, and social and environmental impact analysis'.

And the oil and gas company is facing a double whammy over its performance: an EU-funded project, Advance, has assessed the environmental performance of 65 European manufacturers for 'sustainable value', or non-financial corporate performance in monetary terms. The highest ranked company at present, getting a sustainable value of more than $33.4 billion, is DaimlerChrysler. Shell ranks lowest on the list, with a negative value of $230 billion.

Advance claims the survey is the most comprehensive of its kind, but Shell says it does 'not take full account of sustainability practices, as its focus is quite narrow, and in such a limiting survey the oil and gas sector will factor poorly'.

The shareholder resolution was initiated by the faith-based Ecumenical Council for Corporate Responsibility, which has monitored Shell for years and has the backing of 130 of its shareholders, representing almost a million shares.

The council claims that Shell's Corrib pipeline project in County Mayo, Ireland, 'indicates a policy deficit' with regard to accepting environmental impact assessments done by other firms. It also points to oil spills on Sakhalin Island, Russia, and to last December's contempt of court proceedings filed against Shell Nigeria for its 'failure to stop the flaring of poisonous waste gases' in the Niger Delta.

Shell says it is committed to complying 'with all relevant local standards'.

Join the H4PJ Green Team

Learn Practical Steps to be more Green
Join the H4PJ Green Team
Read what we believe

My Problem with Christian-ism
A believer spells out the difference between faith and a political agenda

by Andrew Sullivan
Originally published by Time Magazine

Are you a Christian who doesn't feel represented by the religious right? I know the feeling. When the discourse about faith is dominated by political fundamentalists and social conservatives, many others begin to feel as if their religion has been taken away from them.

The number of Christians misrepresented by the Christian right is many. There are evangelical Protestants who believe strongly that Christianity should not get too close to the corrupting allure of government power. There are lay Catholics who, while personally devout, are socially liberal on issues like contraception, gay rights, women's equality and a multi-faith society. There are very orthodox believers who nonetheless respect the freedom and conscience of others as part of their core understanding of what being a Christian is. They have no problem living next to an atheist or a gay couple or a single mother or people whose views on the meaning of life are utterly alien to them--and respecting their neighbors' choices. That doesn't threaten their faith. Sometimes the contrast helps them understand their own faith better.

And there are those who simply believe that, by definition, God is unknowable to our limited, fallible human minds and souls. If God is ultimately unknowable, then how can we be so certain of what God's real position is on, say, the fate of Terri Schiavo? Or the morality of contraception? Or the role of women? Or the love of a gay couple? Also, faith for many of us is interwoven with doubt, a doubt that can strengthen faith and give it perspective and shadow. That doubt means having great humility in the face of God and an enormous reluctance to impose one's beliefs, through civil law, on anyone else.

I would say a clear majority of Christians in the U.S. fall into one or many of those camps. Yet the term "people of faith" has been co-opted almost entirely in our discourse by those who see Christianity as compatible with only one political party, the Republicans, and believe that their religious doctrines should determine public policy for everyone. "Sides are being chosen," Tom DeLay recently told his supporters, "and the future of man hangs in the balance! The enemies of virtue may be on the march, but they have not won, and if we put our trust in Christ, they never will." So Christ is a conservative Republican?

Rush Limbaugh recently called the Democrats the "party of death" because of many Democrats' view that some moral decisions, like the choice to have a first-trimester abortion, should be left to the individual, not the cops. Ann Coulter, with her usual subtlety, simply calls her political opponents "godless," the title of her new book. And the largely nonreligious media have taken the bait. The "Christian" vote has become shorthand in journalism for the Republican base.

What to do about it? The worst response, I think, would be to construct something called the religious left. Many of us who are Christians and not supportive of the religious right are not on the left either. In fact, we are opposed to any politicization of the Gospels by any party, Democratic or Republican, by partisan black churches or partisan white ones. "My kingdom is not of this world," Jesus insisted. What part of that do we not understand?

Click here to continue reading.

GIVE TO HOPE FOR PEACE & JUSTICE
Donate Now to support us as we seek to create a culture of peace, inclusiveness, compassion.

CONTACT US
Click here to contact H4PJ on a variety of subjects.

PRIVACY NOTICE
Read our privacy policy.

Home | About | Issues | Donate Now | Take Action | eNews | Interfaith Peace Chapel
Hope for Peace & Justice™ - P. O. Box 35269 - Dallas, TX 75235 - 214-351-1432 - Fax: 214-351-6099 - Contact Us